2026 · Preprint
Reveree: Diagnosing LLM Reverse-Engineering Agents
Evaluates reverse-engineering agent traces through flag recovery, eight analysis milestones and action profiles. Deterministic checks and an outcome-blinded LLM judge help locate failures beyond a single solve-rate score.
Scope and limitations
Uses 88 public CTF challenges and nine models; all four prompting strategies are compared on four models. Evaluation fixes the D-CIPHER harness and uses one attempt per setting. One expert checks 15 traces; agreement on judged comprehension stages is 53/60. Recall and surface-perturbation probes do not eliminate contamination.
Why it fits this collection
Adds process-level evaluation for binary-analysis agents.
Publication and review details
- Venue
- arXiv
- Status
- Preprint
- Publication / posting date
- September 1, 2026
- Date source
- First arXiv submission; no reviewed venue publication is established.
- First arXiv submission
- September 1, 2026
- arXiv
- 2609.01185
- Reviewed arXiv version
- v1
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2609.01185
Reviewed arXiv v1 and registered DOI. The paper announces a release, but the reviewed manuscript does not identify a dedicated artifact URL. No code, challenge binaries or experiments were run.
Sources reviewed
Source review only; experiments were not rerun for this collection. Cite the original authors using the linked paper or BibTeX.